I would like to give some reasons as to why I am vehemently anti-Hillary.
1. The reason I dislike MANY politicians is because most of them are unethical and lack integrity. To say that Hillary (and Bill) Clinton lacks integrity would be the understatement of all of earth's existance. She has a very powerful political machine that will chop off the phallic object of all those who oppose it. She is beyond desperate to get elected for her own political gain, and that disgusts me.
2. I believe that with personal liberty comes personal responsibility. Hillary would disagree, she thinks that it is HER job to fix everything. So what she wants to do is tax us to death because she feels that she is the best person to decide how our money is spent. She is dead wrong. Her principles in this regard go against everything America was founded upon. I personally take responsibility for myself by going to college and working hard so I can get a good job. I am not doing it so I can pay for welfare people, or for people's health care. I am doing it for me, myself, and I, and a Clinton in the White House severely threatens my ideals in that regard. Not to mention, government services are of obscenely poor quality.
3. I can see right through her and see that she is very much a war-hawk. I think that what A LOT of the candidates have to offer in terms of foreign policy is just wrong on so many levels and does not help my wallet in terms of the taxes that I pay. Hillary opposes George Bush's foreign policy just because he is George Bush. She calls for Congressional approval, but only so she can get her $.02 in, it's not like she offers anything new. The War in Iraq? The Patriot Act? She voted for them.
She is just the wrong choice all around. Out of all 9 Presidential candidates yet remaining, only 2 remain to impress me: Ron Paul and Mike Gravel (ignored by the media altogether). I am not necessarily in favor of some of Gravel's economic ideals (he is a socialist like Hillary) but I do appreciate his integrity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
My problem is though that with Clinton, you don't have to guess what she is going to do. In debates, she constantly lays out her plans to the voters. You can't say that about Obama.
In regards to her wanting political power, I think it is a fair assessment that everyone in the race wants political power. With that being said, Hillary has paid her dues and her time. People like Obama have been barely in the political arena at all.
Yea she lays out all her plans but who is going to pay for them all? She has been planning this Presidential run for more than a decade, so of course she has plans drawn up. She is a VERY smart politician. I certainly don't want to pay for her plans, so I don't want to see her win.
Also Hillary "paying her dues" is not a good thing. She has been around a long time and undoubtedly has favors to pay back. She is tight with special interests.
Mitt Romney, who I don't really like, made a good point when he said that by funding a good chunk of his own campaign, then at least he doesn't have any favors to pay back. Clinton has dirty money.
You're going to get taxed to support plans with ANY new president. That is, unless you want them to ignore problems.
The government SHOULD ignore problems. Americans are fully capable of taking care of themselves. Do we need social services? Do we need as extensive of a foreign policy as we do? Do we need the Federal Reserve? Absolutely not.
Ron Paul has a great deal of new plans but that doesn't mean he is going to raise our taxes. He wants to abolish the income tax and cut government spending. That is what is best for Americans' economic freedom and to repair the defecit.
I don't like the Republicans policy of spending as much as they can and racking up 9 trillion dollars in debt. I similarly do not like the Democrats taxing, taxing and taxing before they spend. I want someone who doesn't tax OR spend.
Post a Comment