Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Breaking News: John Edwards drops out




Edwards quits presidential race

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- Former Sen. John Edwards dropped out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination on Wednesday.

"It is time for me to step aside so that history can blaze its path," Edwards said in New Orleans, the same city where he first declared his run for the 2008 Democratic presidential race.

With his wife, Elizabeth, and children at his side, Edwards said he couldn't predict "who will take the final steps to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.," but he said it would be a Democrat.

"We must do better if we want to live up to the promise of this country we love so much," he said.

Earlier, an Edwards aide said the candidate was not getting the media attention he needed to get his message out and win delegates, especially with races coming up in 22 states next Tuesday.

Edwards has amassed 26 delegates for the Democratic nomination.

Campaign money was not an issue, the aide said. Watch Edwards announce his decision »

Edwards has trailed Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois in the early contests, including a third-place finish in Tuesday's Florida primary with 14 percent of the votes. He also came in third in key races in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

An aide said Edwards does not plan to endorse either Clinton or Obama at this time but he may do so in the future.

Edwards said he has spoken with Obama and Clinton and received their pledge to make poverty a top issue of their campaigns and -- if either reaches the White House -- a central part of their administration.

Reacting earlier to Edwards' plans, Obama praised his former rival.

"At a time when our politics is too focused on who's up and who's down, he made a nation focus again on who matters -- the New Orleans child without a home, the West Virginia miner without a job, the families who live in that other America that is not seen or heard or talked about by our leaders in Washington," Obama said Wednesday.

Clinton called Edwards a champion of the American people.

"John Edwards ended his campaign today in the same way he started it -- by standing with the people who are too often left behind and nearly always left out of our national debate," Clinton said in a statement.

Some political pundits predict Edwards' supporters are more likely to lean in Obama's direction. Watch analyst Mark Halperin explain endorsement possibilities »

"The conventional wisdom is that Barack Obama will pick up maybe 60 percent of them, and in some places, that makes a huge difference," former presidential adviser David Gergen said.

Time magazine journalist Joe Klein said, "I don't think he endorses Hillary Clinton. The question is whether or not he endorses Barack Obama."

Klein contends that Clinton "represents a lot of the things that [Edwards] campaigned against, you know, the old Washington Democratic establishment that he believes got too close to the corporations in the '90s."

Edwards had campaigned on the message that he was standing up for the little guy, the people who are not traditionally given a voice in Washington, and that he would do more to fight special interests.

Commenting on his trip to New Orleans, Edwards said Tuesday the city symbolized why he chose to run for president.

"It's a living, breathing example of the heart of my message, what I'm talking about," Edwards said. "I mean it's the failure of government to be there when people need it. It's a perfect indication of the conditions of poverty that exist in America."

On Wednesday, he vowed to continue his fight for economic equality in the United States.

"We're going to rebuild today and work today, and we will continue to come back," he said in Musicians' Village, where he was helping a Habitat for Humanity project to rebuild homes lost to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Klein said Edwards played a positive role in spurring his competitors during the early part of the campaign.

"On a lot of substantive issues like health insurance, he was the first one out of the box with a very ambitious universal plan, and I think he forced the others to become bolder in a lot of their policy prescriptions, energy dependence and so on," Klein said.

The remaining Democratic contenders face off in a debate at 8 p.m. ET Thursday on CNN.

One Edwards aide said he is not dropping out of the race due to his wife's health. Elizabeth Edwards announced last year that her breast cancer had returned.

She was first diagnosed with breast cancer during her husband's 2004 vice presidential campaign as John Kerry's running mate.

John Edwards is a South Carolina native with an undergraduate degree from North Carolina State University and law degree from the University of North Carolina.

Before entering politics, winning a Senate seat from North Carolina in 1998, Edwards was a lawyer representing families "being victimized by powerful interests" and gaining "a national reputation as a forceful and tireless champion for regular, hard-working people," according to his campaign Web site.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Hillary is Angelou's 'Girlfriend' but Does Race Matter in the President Race?

Maya Angelou, a prominent member of the black community, has long been a part Hilary Clinton's campaign, giving her support to the New York senator and citing that Barrack Obama "lacks experience."

Angelou released a video that made its way onto YouTube for the Clinton campaign in which she reads the poem "Rising" that she wrote about Clinton. The video was first shown to almost 300 women of color back in the middle of June, according to Clinton's website.

Angelou's support was in response to the overwhelmingly positive response television personality Oprah Winfrey gives Obama. Controversy has arisen now that Angelou has offered her voice and kind words as the star of Clinton's latest radio spot. In the radio spot, Angelou's distinctive voice doles on about how great of a president Clinton would make, clearly opposing Obama.

"I know what kind of President Hillary Clinton will be," Angelou said, "because I know who she is."

Angelou's support was meant to garner support from black voters in South Carolina, speaking directly to black voters in parts of the ad. The results of the primaries, with Obama winning South Carolina, have shown that he still holds strong with black voters. With an inefluential black woman backing Clinton, offering support in the very home state the poet once lived in, Clinton still failed to win.

In the end many questions are left. Was Winfrey really that influential, is Angelou outdated, or are black people simply voting on race despite an influential member of their community telling them how they will best get support?

Monday, January 28, 2008

Bush's State of the Union


How was President Bush's State of the Union?
I thought it was just a bore. He has mishandled this country, so much that in 2006, the country ousted all the Republicans to get a democratic majority. And he has the lowest approval rating in the history of this country.
What do you guys think?

Obama's Problem: His friend Rezko


By Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz
Jan. 10, 2008

In sharp contrast to his tough talk about ethics reform in government, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., approached a well-known Illinois political fixer under active federal investigation, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, for "advice" as he sought to find a way to buy a house shortly after being elected to the United States Senate.

The parcel included an adjacent lot which Obama told the Chicago Tribune he could not afford because "it was already a stretch to buy the house."

On the same day Obama closed on his house, Rezko's wife bought the adjacent empty lot, meeting the condition of the seller who wanted to sell both properties at the same time.
Rezko had been widely reported to be under investigation by the U.S. attorney and the FBI at the time Obama contacted him and has since been indicted on corruption charges by a federal grand jury in a case that prosecutors say involves bribes, kickbacks and "efforts to illegally obtain millions of dollars."

This week, a federal judge in Chicago ordered the Rezko trial to begin Feb. 25.
Obama maintains his relationship with Rezko was "above board and legal" but has admitted bad judgment, calling his decision to involve Rezko "a bone-headed mistake."

Rezko's behind-the-scenes connection in the Obama house deal became public as Rezko revealed personal financial details as he sought to post bail.

While Rezko's wife paid the full asking price for the land, Obama paid $300,000 under the asking price for the house. The house sold for $1,650,000 and the price Rezko's wife paid for the land was $625,000.

Obama denies there was anything unusual about the price disparity. He says the price on the house was dropped because it had been on the market for some time but that the price for the adjacent land remained high because there was another offer.

Obama then expanded his property by buying a strip of the Rezko land for $104,5000, which the senator maintains was a fair market price.

Obama later told the Chicago Sun-Times, "It was a mistake to have been engaged with him at all in this or any other personal business dealing that would allow him, or anyone else, to believe he had done me a favor."

Obama had known Rezko long before the house deal, calling him a "friend."

An ABC News review of campaign records shows Rezko, and people connected to him, contributed more than $120,000 to Obama's 2004 campaign for the U.S. Senate, much of it at a time when Rezko was the target of an FBI investigation.

"It surprised me that late in the game he [Obama] continued to take contributions from somebody who was under a rather dark cloud in the state," said Cynthia Canary of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, a group that has worked closely with Obama and supported his legislative efforts.

In the wake of the Rezko indictment, Obama says he has given $44,000 of the Rezko-connected money to charity.

There is no mention of Obama in the Rezko indictment. Federal authorities say the investigation is focused on Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, identified in court filings as Public Figure A.

Author Toni Morrison endorses Obama

The woman who famously labeled Bill Clinton as the "first black president" is backing Barack Obama to be the second.

Author Toni Morrison said her endorsement of the Democratic presidential candidate has little to do with Obama's race — he is the son of a black father from Kenya and a white mother from Kansas — but rather his personal gifts.


Writing with the touch of a poet in a letter to the Illinois senator, Morrison explained why she chose Obama over Hillary Rodham Clinton for her first public presidential endorsement.

Morrison, whose acclaimed novels usually concentrate on the lives of black women, said she has admired Clinton for years because of her knowledge and mastery of politics, but then dismissed that experience in favor of Obama's vision.

Is this really surprising or shocking? Is it worthy of making Yahoo! Headlines like it did? When your reason for voting and supporting someone is "his personal gifts" you know you're getting a bullshit answer. And if you have to include the fact that his race is not an issue? Then, it probably is a reason why you're voting for him.

I find it comical the blacks who praise how great the Clinton Administration was for them, but now, overwhelmingly support Barack Obama, when he has a very small track record and he has not championed black rights and issues like Hillary and Bill have in the past. Morrison said that she had admired Hillary for years because of her knowledge and mastery of politics, but that goes on the backburner because of "Obama's vision." Obama's vision is one word - Change. How does one word override knowledge and mastery of politics?

It just bugs me to see African Americans like Oprah and Toni Morrison, who have been in the media for decades, decide to outright support a Presidential candidate the second Barack Obama runs. If they were so concerned for the welfare of our nation this entire time, where were they in 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004? If you're going to vote for him based on race, just say it because in the end, the person looks like an idiot.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Interesting Stats

Out of the 8 remaining candidates, 4 are currently in congress, 1 is a former Senator, and 3 (Giuliani, Romney and Huckabee) have never served in Congress. The Washington Post keeps track of voting records and stats. I wanted to post the stats for votes missed and times voted with party majority during the 110th congress for Clinton, Paul, McCain and Obama (I can't find Edwards' stats, he hasn't been there since 108th congress)

Hillary Clinton (D-NY): Could not be bothered to show up for 23.6% of votes. Votes with the Democrats 97.1% of the time.

John McCain (R-AZ): Could not be bothered to show up for 56.1% of votes. Votes with the Republicans 87.7% of the time.

Barack Obama (D-IL): Could not be bothered to show up for 37.8% of votes. Votes with the Democrats 96.4% of the time.

Ron Paul (R-TX): Could not be bothered to show up for 28.2% of votes. Votes with the Republicans 74.9% of the time.

Ron Paul's 74.9% party voting bloc loyalty is actually the second lowest in the entire House of Reps which is a good thing.

My overall assessment? Clinton's salary should be cut by 23.6%, McCain's salary should be cut by 56.1%, Obama's salary should be cut by 37.8%, and Paul's salary should be cut by 28.2%. If they can't bother to serve the electorate and do the job they were elected to do, their salaries should be adjusted accordingly. I always hate Presidential campaigns when these "public servants" put their duties on the backburner in favor of furthering themselves. It is a waste of the taxpayer dollars that go to their bloated salaries.

Ted and Caroline Kennedy endorse Obama!








Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) plans to endorse Barack Obama for President tommorow.









Caroline Kennedy endorsed Barack Obama in the New York Times today.

A President Like My Father

"OVER the years, I’ve been deeply moved by the people who’ve told me they wished they could feel inspired and hopeful about America the way people did when my father was president. This sense is even more profound today. That is why I am supporting a presidential candidate in the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama."

Thought to Ponder

If all else remained unchanged, would Hillary Clinton be as popular as she is if she was a) a male; and b) not married to a former (popular) President? If EVERYTHING else remained the same including her personality, charisma (or lack thereof) and political positions/plans, would there have been a high demand for her to run for President, and subsequently, a high demand to elect her?

On a similar note, if everything about Barack Obama was the same except his ethnic background, would he be as popular as he is? Personally, I think no. I used to post at a message board during the 2004 election when he was first elected to the Senate. As soon as he was elected, someone said "I think Marek Obema that black guy who was just elected should run in 08!" I asked the person if they knew anything about his positions, they said no, but they think he would be good regardless. Which shows that his race made him famous.

Hillary? Maybe she could do well if she was a man. The two most common words I hear used to describe her are "cunt" and "bitch" which wouldn't be the case if she was a man. And she is a very shrewd, calculating politician. I don't think Republicans would hate her as much if she was a man.

The Ever-'Present' Obama

by: Nathan Gonzelez

Finally and officially, Barack Obama is running for president. His symbolic announcement, in the Land of Lincoln, called for a new era in politics. Obama downplayed his thin federal experience while championing his record on the state and local level, and he talked about the need to change Washington, set priorities, and "make hard choices."

"What's stopped us is the failure of leadership, the smallness of our politics - the ease with which we're distracted by the petty and trivial, our chronic avoidance of tough decisions," Obama said in his announcement speech. But a closer look at the presidential candidate's record in the Illinois Legislature reveals something seemingly contradictory: a number of occasions when Obama avoided making hard choices.

While some conservatives and Republicans surely will harp on what they call his "liberal record," highlighting applicable votes to support their case, it's Obama's history of voting "present" in Springfield - even on some of the most controversial and politically explosive issues of the day - that raises questions that he will need to answer. Voting "present" is one of three options in the Illinois Legislature (along with "yes" and "no"), but it's almost never an option for the occupant of the Oval Office.

We aren't talking about a "present" vote on whether to name a state office building after a deceased state official, but rather about votes that reflect an officeholder's core values.
For example, in 1997, Obama voted "present" on two bills (HB 382 and SB 230) that would have prohibited a procedure often referred to as partial birth abortion. He also voted "present" on SB 71, which lowered the first offense of carrying a concealed weapon from a felony to a misdemeanor and raised the penalty of subsequent offenses.

In 1999, Obama voted "present" on SB 759, a bill that required mandatory adult prosecution for firing a gun on or near school grounds. The bill passed the state Senate 52-1. Also in 1999, Obama voted "present" on HB 854 that protected the privacy of sex-abuse victims by allowing petitions to have the trial records sealed. He was the only member to not support the bill.
In 2001, Obama voted "present" on two parental notification abortion bills (HB 1900 and SB 562), and he voted "present" on a series of bills (SB 1093, 1094, 1095) that sought to protect a child if it survived a failed abortion. In his book, the Audacity of Hope, on page 132, Obama explained his problems with the "born alive" bills, specifically arguing that they would overturn Roe v. Wade. But he failed to mention that he only felt strongly enough to vote "present" on the bills instead of "no."

And finally in 2001, Obama voted "present" on SB 609, a bill prohibiting strip clubs and other adult establishments from being within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, and daycares.
If Obama had taken a position for or against these bills, he would have pleased some constituents and alienated others. Instead, the Illinois legislator-turned-U.S. senator and, now, Democratic presidential hopeful essentially took a pass.

Some of these bills may have been "bad. They may have included poison pills or been poorly written, making it impossible for Obama to support them. They may have even been unconstitutional. When I asked the Obama campaign about those votes, they explained that in some cases, the Senator was uncomfortable with only certain parts of the bill, while in other cases, the bills were attempts by Republicans simply to score points.

But even if that were the case, it doesn't explain his votes. The state legislator had an easy solution if the bills were unacceptable to him: he could have voted against them and explained his reasoning.

Because it takes affirmative votes to pass legislation in the Illinois Senate, a "present" vote is tantamount to a "no" vote. A "present" vote is generally used to provide political cover for legislators who don't want to be on the record against a bill that they oppose. Of course, Obama isn't the first or only Illinois state senator to vote "present," but he is the only one running for President of the United States.

While these votes occurred while Obama and the Democrats were in the minority in the Illinois Senate, in the Audacity of Hope (page 130), Obama explained that even as a legislator in the minority, "You must vote yes or no on whatever bill comes up, with the knowledge that it's unlikely to be a compromise that either you or your supporters consider fair and or just."
Obama's "present" record could hurt him in two very different ways in his bid to win the Democratic presidential nomination and, ultimately, the White House. On one hand, those votes could anger some Democrats, even liberals, because he did not take a strong enough stand on their issues. On the other hand, his votes could simply be portrayed by adversaries as a failure of leadership for not being willing to make a tough decision and stick by it.

Obama is one of the most dynamic and captivating figures in American politics at this time, and he has put together an excellent campaign team. He clearly is a factor in the race for the Democratic nomination in 2008.

But as Democrats - and Americans - are searching for their next leader, the Illinois senator's record, and not just his rhetoric, will be examined under a microscope. As president, Obama will be faced with countless difficult decisions on numerous gray issues, and voting "present" will not be an option. He will need to explain those "present" votes as a member of the Illinois Legislature if he hopes to become America's commander-in-chief.

Recent AOL.com Polls

The poll above has had a lot of voters, well over 300,000 voters. While it is far from a scientific poll, I am surprised how John Edwards loses almost 12% when asked who we thought was going to win. I hope that people still vote for who they want in the election even though they have a feeling their candidate of choice is not going to get the nomination.

I am really surprised at this poll the most. Mike Huckabee, after winning Iowa, I thought would be unstoppable. He wasn't expected to win, kind of like John Kerry in 2004, and he had a lot of momentum going into states like Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. However, his momentum in my eyes is at a stand-still. Even Romney is falling back, which is surprising.

This also raises the question that if Democrats are divided as to who should be the nominee, and in regards to this poll, the Republicans are united, it really makes you wonder if the Democrats are going to rally behind the eventual candidate.

Hillary Clinton uses Fake Southern Accent while campaigning in Alabama!

Hillary and Obama Clash!

Nevada Caucus - DEMS




CLINTON OBAMA

Observations:

  • Nevada Split by Region.
  • Hillary Clinton overwhelmingly won Southern Nevada while Obama carried the Northern part of the state.
  • Hispanic vote strongly supported Hillary over Obama.
  • Super Tuesday States will most likely have the same result with Hispanic voters such as California and Arizona.
  • Interestingly, Obama won the more rural part of the state.
  • Turnout in DEM Caucus was greater than GOP Caucus - This has become a trend as each state votes... - What does this mean in General Election?

Questions for Clinton & Edwards

1) I am going to college so I can get a job. On the whole, pretty much all people who work hard for a higher education get a job with a benefits package that includes health insurance. Why should I and other hardworkers be paying for someone's health care if they chose not to take advantage of the opportunities that American capitalism has to offer them?

2) I eat reasonably healthy and choose to work out several times each week. Obesity is a choice that people make for themselves by not practicing good health. Why should I and others who live a healthy life style be forced to pay for health problems that come in association with obesity?

3) I choose not to smoke cigarettes. Therefore, chances are, I will not develop lung cancer in my lifetime because of a responsible choice that I made. Why should I and others who do not smoke be forced to pay for healthcare treatment for someone who has lung cancer because they chose to smoke 3 packs of cigarettes each day?

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Ann Coulter: "THEY THROW LIKE SISSIES!"

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) berates Condoleezza Rice!

John McCain and Miss Teen USA

My Favorite Hillary Quote!



"We both have very passionate, committed spouses who stand up for us, and I'm very proud of that."
-Hillary Clinton; January 21, 2008

MTV, South Carolina, and Race

It was Friday evening and sometimes during commercials on MTV, they have an MTV News alert with John Norris or Sway. This time, Sway was at a college in South Carolina asking students who they were going to vote for in the Democratic Primary. Then, Sway would reveal how the student faired on a political quizz that is designed to match a person up with a candidate they had the most in common with.

Countless people, most black, said without hesitation that Obama was their candidate of course. But what was alarming was that most of these people were told that their quizz results showed they shared common interests with Senator Clinton.

One girl said when asked who she supported, "I support Edwards and Obama, but definitely not Hillary." When she was told her results, the quizz said she had a ton in common with Hillary. She proceeded to say, "Well, the other two say what they're going to do, she does not."

In my opinion, Hillary is the only democratic candidate who did say her plans. Obama runs on one word "Change." I mean, that sounds great to the ear, but this girl seems like she doesn't have a clue why she is supporting who she claims to be supporting.

Another thing that was interesting was that a black student outright answered "Well to be truthful, I am voting for Obama because he is black." This is not a misquote. Someone said that. Now, if I was to say on-air "Yes I am voting Hillary or Edwards because they're white and I am, too..." I would have Al Sharpton and the NAACP at my doorstep.

As an experiment, I IMed SlickayRicky15, who is black, and told him I was voting Hillary or Edwards because they're white like me. He replied, "You are racist then."

So are these blacks being racist? I mean, I get we have never had a black president, but it sounds like to me that this is affirmative action or reverse racism.

Hopefully A Sign of Things to Come this Spring/Summer/Fall

John McCain (circa 1998, at a Republican gathering): Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father!

Meanwhile, Slick Willy says that Hillary & John are biffles *rolls eyes* (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/25/bill-clinton-john-mccain-and-hillary-are-very-close/)

"I WANT TO TAKE THOSE PROFITS!"

Hillary Clinton Rally - 1/23

I was lucky enough to attend a Hillary Clinton rally this past Wednesday in North Bergen, NJ. Senator Hillary Clinton was there to accept the endorsement of New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez. It was an enjoyable experience and I was able to get a few pictures. Hillary received the loudest cheers when she spoke about a total change in No Child Left Behind, stopping the war against science and more affordable college education for all.











Age: More Than a Number?

Sixteen is an awkward age. You're too young to do things that the older crowd does, yet too old to do childish things. In the political world at the age of sixteen you're not old enough to vote yet your old enough to have a solid, well-formed opinion. But of how much value is that opinion?

Take, for example, the war in Iraq. A war that was started before George W.'s second term. How old were these young ones when the war began? They can't have been that old. Do they understand the climate the war began in? Possibly. Or possibly they were too busy playing with their Pokemon toys to truly understand. Anything said, no matter how much research was done, could and should be taken with a grain of salt. After all.. these people don't actually have a vote at all.

It has long been questioned whether the voting age should be lowered. It was a push to get the age lowered to 18 and it is a good age. You are finally maturing, becoming an adult. I would hate to see a bunch of young teenagers who can't even vote be given something as powerful as a vote.

So what do you think? Should young kids be listened to? After all, politics isn't much of an area for the young.

NEW! - SUPER TUESDAY POLLS

GOP:

Illinois: McCain 31 , Romney 20 - McCain +11
Missouri: Huckabee 27, McCain 26 - Huckabee +1
California: McCain 29, Romney 17 - McCain +12
Arizona: McCain 40, Romney 23 - McCain +17

DEM:

Tennessee: Clinton 34, Obama 20 - Clinton +14
Arizona: Clinton 37, Obama 27 - Clinton + 10
Illinois: Obama 51, Clinton 22 - Obama +29
Missouri: Clinton 44, Obama 31 - Clinton +13
California: Clinton 43, Obama 28 - Clinton +15

Bongiorno Miei compagni

It should be a very exciting few months with you all. I will be representing the cool calm collective thoughts of a party that doesn't ruin our nation.

CARING FOR THE POOR: $400 HAIRCUTS!!!


This is how Edwards defines helping poor people: Getting $400 Haircuts.

The Race Thus Far

Pledged Delegates to Date:

Democrats (Magic number = 2,025)

Barack Obama 63
Hillary Clinton 48
John Edwards 26

Republicans (Magic number = 1,191)

Mitt Romney 67
John McCain 38
Mike Huckabee 26
Ron Paul 6
Rudy Giuliani 1

Looking Ahead:

1/29 Florida primaries
2/3 Maine caucus (R)
2/5 SUPER TUESDAY
  • Alabama (P)
  • Alaska (C)
  • Arizona (P)
  • Arkansas (P)
  • California (P)
  • Colorado (C)
  • Connecticut (P)
  • Delaware (P)
  • Georgia (P)
  • Idaho (C) (D)
  • Illinois (P)
  • Kansas (C) (D)
  • Massachusetts (P)
  • Minnesota (P)
  • Missouri (P)
  • Montana (C) (R)
  • New Jersey (P)
  • New Mexico (P) (D)
  • New York (P)
  • North Dakota (C)
  • Oklahoma (P)
  • Tennessee (P)
  • Utah (P)
  • West Virginia (C) (R)
***(P = Primary) (C = Caucus) (D = Democrats only) (R = Republicans only)

Why I Oppose Hillary Clinton

I would like to give some reasons as to why I am vehemently anti-Hillary.

1. The reason I dislike MANY politicians is because most of them are unethical and lack integrity. To say that Hillary (and Bill) Clinton lacks integrity would be the understatement of all of earth's existance. She has a very powerful political machine that will chop off the phallic object of all those who oppose it. She is beyond desperate to get elected for her own political gain, and that disgusts me.

2. I believe that with personal liberty comes personal responsibility. Hillary would disagree, she thinks that it is HER job to fix everything. So what she wants to do is tax us to death because she feels that she is the best person to decide how our money is spent. She is dead wrong. Her principles in this regard go against everything America was founded upon. I personally take responsibility for myself by going to college and working hard so I can get a good job. I am not doing it so I can pay for welfare people, or for people's health care. I am doing it for me, myself, and I, and a Clinton in the White House severely threatens my ideals in that regard. Not to mention, government services are of obscenely poor quality.

3. I can see right through her and see that she is very much a war-hawk. I think that what A LOT of the candidates have to offer in terms of foreign policy is just wrong on so many levels and does not help my wallet in terms of the taxes that I pay. Hillary opposes George Bush's foreign policy just because he is George Bush. She calls for Congressional approval, but only so she can get her $.02 in, it's not like she offers anything new. The War in Iraq? The Patriot Act? She voted for them.

She is just the wrong choice all around. Out of all 9 Presidential candidates yet remaining, only 2 remain to impress me: Ron Paul and Mike Gravel (ignored by the media altogether). I am not necessarily in favor of some of Gravel's economic ideals (he is a socialist like Hillary) but I do appreciate his integrity.

Good work!

Nice blog - Good work Rhi

Welcome to the Blog!

Right now and for the next year, politics is going to be a huge debate. Therefore, I put together a blog so many people can come together and blog articles, opinions, and pictures on this web log. For the time being, I have selected just a few to blog with me. I may add or delete bloggers as time goes on.

Remember, anyone may comment.